Whether you can show before-and-after photos depends on context. Registered Australian practitioners can share them during clinical consultations, but using them in public-facing advertising, including social media, your website or email campaigns, is tightly conditioned by AHPRA's 2025 cosmetic advertising guidelines, and for injectables the TGA says such photos are likely unlawful advertising. The line between clinical information and promotional advertising is what determines what is permitted.
Updated 2 October 2026
In short: permitted in a consultation setting, conditional in outward advertising, and best avoided in public for injectables.
What do AHPRA's advertising guidelines say about before-and-after photos?
AHPRA (the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) sets the advertising rules for registered health practitioners, including cosmetic nurses, doctors and allied health professionals. Under section 133 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, advertising that creates an unreasonable expectation of beneficial treatment is prohibited.
Since 2 September 2025, AHPRA's guidelines for advertising higher risk non-surgical cosmetic procedures spell out the conditions. Before-and-after images must be genuine photos of the practitioner's own patients, matched as closely as possible in lighting, camera angle, background, framing, posture, clothing and makeup, not edited or filtered, and labelled with how long after the procedure the "after" photo was taken. Images of anyone under 18 must not be used, and patients must be able to withdraw consent for their images at any time. The guidelines still caution that these images can create unrealistic expectations of what a treatment will achieve. The concern is straightforward: a handpicked outcome photo can lead a prospective patient to expect results that are not typical for them. That gap between expectation and reality is exactly what the guidelines are designed to prevent.
Showing a patient their own expected results during a clinical consultation is a very different act from posting outcome photos publicly to attract new clients. The first is patient care; the second is advertising, and it is governed accordingly. For a broader summary of what the guidelines cover, see our guide to AHPRA cosmetic advertising guidelines.
What is the difference between education and advertising for clinics?
AHPRA draws a meaningful distinction between educational content and advertising. Educational content explains treatments, conditions or procedures in a factual, balanced way. Advertising is content designed to promote your clinic's services and attract new clients.
A blog post explaining how a skin treatment works, what the typical recovery looks like, and who it is suitable for, that is education. A social media post showing a transformation image with a caption encouraging readers to book, that is advertising, and it is the type of content the guidelines address.
The intent matters, but so does presentation. Content that implies "you could look like this", even without saying it, tends to read as promotional. Content that says "here is how the treatment works and what a typical healing process involves" is far safer ground.
If your content is designed to attract a new client or persuade someone to book, AHPRA considers it advertising. Apply the guidelines to it. If it is information shared with an existing patient to help them make an informed clinical decision, it sits in a different category. When in doubt, get specific advice from a healthcare marketing compliance specialist.
What can cosmetic clinics actually show on social media?
Social media posts by registered practitioners are generally treated as advertising under AHPRA's guidelines, regardless of the platform. The same rules that apply to your website apply to Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and any other channel you use to promote your clinic. Here is how common content types generally stack up:
| Content type | Generally permitted? |
|---|---|
| Educational content explaining how a treatment works | Yes, factual information, not promotional |
| Clinic environment, team profiles, behind-the-scenes | Yes, does not make clinical claims |
| General skincare education relevant to your clients | Yes, educational, not tied to a specific service claim |
| Before-and-after photos shared publicly to attract new clients | Conditional for most procedures; likely prohibited for injectables (TGA) |
| Patient testimonials ("I loved my results at this clinic") | No, explicitly prohibited by AHPRA advertising guidelines |
| Naming specific prescription-only treatments in promotions | No, TGA restrictions apply to prescription products |
| Unbranded outcome language ("clients often see improved skin texture") | Generally yes, factual, not patient-specific |
The clinics that build lasting businesses are not doing it through transformation photos. They are doing it through the quality of the experience, and through retention programs that keep clients coming back on their own.
Are there extra restrictions for injectable and prescription treatments?
Yes. The TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) has separate advertising rules that apply to therapeutic goods, including prescription medicines and certain devices. Prescription-only treatments (Schedule 4 medicines) cannot be advertised to the general public at all, as the TGA's guidance on advertising prescription medicines explains. That includes naming specific injectable products in any promotional context, online or offline.
The TGA's cosmetic injections FAQ goes further on photos: where it is apparent the "after" photo is due to a prescription-only cosmetic injectable, the photo is likely to amount to an unlawful advertisement for that medicine. So for injectables, public before-and-after posts are a risk even if every AHPRA condition is met.
This layer sits on top of AHPRA's guidelines, and the two sets of rules work together. A cosmetic injectable clinic operates under both simultaneously: AHPRA's rules on practitioner advertising, and TGA's rules on promoting therapeutic goods. For a full breakdown of how these rules affect loyalty offers and membership structures, our post on TGA and AHPRA rules for clinic loyalty and rewards covers the specifics.
The combined effect is that injectable and prescription-treatment clinics have the tightest advertising restrictions in the cosmetic industry. That is not a disadvantage, it is an incentive to build marketing strategies that work within the rules, and those strategies tend to be more durable anyway.
How to market your clinic's results without risking a complaint
The good news is that compliant marketing still works, and the channels that do not rely on before-and-after photography often produce stronger long-term results. A few approaches that stay well inside the guidelines:
- Focus on education, not proof. Explain treatments thoroughly, describe what the experience is like, and help clients understand what realistic outcomes involve. Informed clients become loyal ones.
- Use general outcome language. Describing outcomes that clients "commonly notice" or "typically experience" keeps copy factual without attaching it to a specific patient's result.
- Invest in the client relationship itself. A branded client app with loyalty points, membership tiers and personalised messages builds the kind of connection that brings clients back without relying on public proof. The retention layer matters more than the advertising layer.
- Keep clinical records where they belong. Before-and-after photos can still be valuable in your practice, as part of clinical documentation, shared with the patient in a secure, access-controlled setting. That is a very different use case from public advertising.
Frequently asked questions
Can Australian cosmetic clinics use before-and-after photos on their website?
Using before-and-after photos in public-facing advertising designed to attract new clients must meet AHPRA's 2025 conditions: genuine, unedited photos of the practitioner's own patients, matched in lighting and framing, with the timing stated and nobody under 18. For injectables, the TGA says before-and-after photos showing the effect of a prescription-only injectable are likely unlawful advertising. These images are generally appropriate in a clinical consultation setting rather than in outward promotion.
Are before-and-after photos allowed on Instagram for Australian clinics?
Instagram posts by registered practitioners are considered advertising under AHPRA's guidelines. Before-and-after posts must meet AHPRA's 2025 conditions for higher risk cosmetic procedures, and for injectables the TGA treats them as likely advertising of a prescription-only medicine. Educational content that explains how treatments work in a factual, balanced way is a safer approach.
What is the difference between a testimonial and a before-and-after photo under AHPRA rules?
A testimonial is a subjective patient statement about the practitioner's service, which AHPRA explicitly prohibits in advertising. A before-and-after photo is a visual outcome representation, which may be permissible in a clinical context but is restricted in promotional advertising because it can create unrealistic expectations of results.
How do I show my clinic's results compliantly in Australia?
Focus on factual education about how treatments work rather than individual outcome images. Use general outcome language rather than patient-specific visuals. For client retention, a loyalty program and branded client app build ongoing relationships without relying on advertising that may conflict with AHPRA's rules. Seek specific advice for your clinic's situation.
